Style Before Safety?

One can debate the merits of Nicola Sturgeon’s leadership over Alex Salmond’s endlessly. However, in my opinion, Ms Sturgoen beats Mr Salmond on sartorial elegance effortlessly. Not least because Mr Salmond famously wore the same tie for seven years.
However, I do feel that Ms Sturgoen  should have been advised better before her recent trip to a construction site in Fife. Inspection of her attire shows that safety hat, protective gloves and a high-visibility vest are all present. However, in place of safety boots she is wearing high-healed shoes. Is this a case of  style before safety or was she simply dressing up for the cameras? Whatever the reason, it is a bad advertisement for improving construction site safety in Scotland.

Nicola’s lack of leadership on the oil, and how Jim can Benefit


Euan McColm had a good piece in the Scotland on Sunday today relating to Ms Sturgeon’s lack of leadership on the oil price crash. Of course, the problem the First Minister faces is that the crisis simultaneously highlights the problems associated with an economy overly reliant on oil and also the benefits of Scotland being part of the much larger UK economy. The news that the fall in oil price was not even discussed at the Scottish Cabinet meeting this week confirms this point.

The implicit question posed by McColm concerns Alex Salmond – would he have handled the situation differently? He would have and he did. Mid-week, in order to defend his successor, he tried to move our attention back to the SNP’s obsession – constitutional change. However, his suggestion that “Home Rule” could be won in May’s General Election quickly fell victim to the oil price crash when its was highlighted that it would  mean Scotland would have to shoulder the full impact alone. Mr Salmond may well view that as a price worth paying, but it would be economic madness.

Amongst all this turmoil, Jim Murphy is gaining credibility by showing leadership in the vacuum created by the Scottish Government – he may even have momentum. In my view, he needs to play a subtle game however. He must highlight the SNP’s weakness on oil economics without alienating the left-leaning Yes voters with “I told you so” rhetoric. He needs to keep the focus on public services and the impact the SNP’s oil economics would have on them. He needs to encourage left-leaning Yes voters to judge the SNP on their record, not their constitutional nirvana.