Predatory capitalism has no place in Scotland.

CQI8nTdWIAAHUFF

It is important to note that Michelle Thomson MP appears not to be the focus of the police investigation stemming from irregularities the Scottish Solicitors’ Disciplinary Tribunal may have uncovered (report, 30-09-15). Indeed, Thomson is clear that she has “always acted within the law”.

However, whilst   Ms Thomson’s actions may well have been legal, this does not mean they are morally acceptable. Her company, M&F Property Solutions, targeted people who were desperate and exploited that vulnerability.  In one reported case, a 77 year old pensioner undergoing cancer treatment reluctantly sold her property to Thomson’s business partner for £65,000 – it was sold on the same day for £95,000. In another reported example a pensioner felt “preyed upon” when he found he’d sold his property for £25,000 less than it was worth. Thomson bragged online about buying properties at “hugely discounted rates”.

Vulnerable people need to be supported, not exploited. That’s the way society works. The kind of predatory capitalism Michelle Thomson has been involved in may well be legal, but it has no place in Scotland.

These are clearly serious allegations about an SNP MP who leads business policy decision making in the party. Are we really to believe that the people of Edinburgh West would have voted from Michelle Thomson if they had known about how her business had been operated? Can she now credibly support constituents with mortgage problems given her history?

We need full disclosure from the people at the very top of the SNP about who knew what and when. If the SNP are serious about delivering social justice in Scotland they must also now permanently remove her from the party.  This will send a clear message that predatory capitalism has no place in Scotland.

Sign the petition to have Michelle Thomson stand down.  

Advertisements

3 thoughts on “Predatory capitalism has no place in Scotland.

  1. g4rve says:

    ‘targeted’, ‘desperate’, ‘exploted’, ‘preyed’, ‘bragged’.

    Is there any actual evidence to support any of this emotive language?

    At least you make some attempt to do so by linking the words ‘bragged online’, but unfortunately the link is to an article which uses the word ‘boasted’ in the headline, but then fails to justify it in the content.

    Like

    • pixngolfmisc says:

      Is it only the language used by media and bloggers which cause you concern? How about the actual substance of the reports, i.e. the concerns about her company’s business practices?

      She is hardly going to win socialist of the year award if there is such a thing. She may or indeed may not have done anything illegal and we will find out in the fullness of time. However even the most ardent SNP supporter would have difficulty defending the way her business was conducted.

      Rather than being all about social justice it would appear Ms Thomson talks left in public but behaves like a capitalist viper when in business.

      What do you have to say about the substance of the report because your brand of SNP whitabootery won’t wash?

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s